When I first tried the iPhone 16 Pro and the Galaxy S24, I knew both devices would compete with each other! They are not just normal flagships; they are much more than that! Last year, they were the most talked about with their most advanced chipsets. So, if you are confused between the A18 Pro Vs Exynos 2400, this is your answer!
I have been testing these two smartphones with the flagship chips to see which would be the best! I have checked multiple reviews and analysed the hype about it in great detail. So today, I am here with my own analysis for you so that you can make an informed decision. We all know that chips are essential when choosing a smartphone in 2025. Since every other brand is making hype about good features, AI, and more. It’s important to know the details yourself.
Both the A18 Pro Vs Exynos 2400 are powerful enough to handle everything. You can do gaming, photography, and even multitasking. I have compared their specs, speed, and even how they handle everyday tasks. I am going to tell you more than numbers can reveal. Let’s check out the ultimate comparison!
Also Read: A18 Pro Vs A17 Pro Comparison: Benchmarks, Features, AI, And More!
A18 Pro VS Exynos 2400: Overview
Apple made A18 Pro chip using the latest 3nm technology. It is smaller, faster, and uses less power than the A17 Pro. The moment I started using the iPhone 16 Pro, I could tell how quick and smooth the phone was. Apps opened quickly, and everything just worked without any delays.
I liked how well the chip worked with iOS. Apple designed the chip and the software to be perfectly integrated. I loved how it responded to games and photos, used voice features, and more.
The Exynos 2400 in the Galaxy S24 was also very fast, especially in games. I played the BGMI, CoD, and more. Honestly, I loved the experience. The graphics looked amazing, thanks to the AMD-powered GPU. It even had cool features like ray tracing. But sometimes, it didn’t feel as smooth or power-efficient as the iPhone.
Let’s have a quick overview:
| Feature | Apple A18 Pro (iPhone 16 Pro) | Samsung Exynos 2400 (Galaxy S24) |
|---|---|---|
| Processor (CPU) | 6 cores: 2 fast, 4 for saving battery | 10 cores: 1 very fast, 5 fast, 4 for saving battery |
| Graphics (GPU) | Apple’s own 6-core GPU, very fast (1490 MHz) | AMD-powered Xclipse 940, good for gaming (1009 MHz) |
| Chip Size | 3nm (smaller = faster and uses less power) | 4nm (a bit bigger than Apple’s) |
| Memory (RAM type) | LPDDR5 at 3750 MHz | LPDDR5X at 4200 MHz (faster type of memory) |
| AI Performance | 16-core AI engine, up to 35 trillion tasks per second | Strong AI chip, but exact speed not shared |
| Geekbench Single-Core | About 3427 (better for simple tasks) | About 2253 |
| Geekbench Multi-Core | About 9278 (better for heavy tasks) | About 7204 |
| AnTuTu Score | Around 1,840,000 (overall performance score) | Around 1,680,000 |
Also Read: Best Mobile Phone Processors Ranking Top 100 List!
A18 Pro VS Exynos 2400: CPU Performance
When I tested both chipsets, I wanted to see which one was faster. The A18 Pro chip has 6 cores. Two of them run at 4.05 GHz. The Exynos 2400 chip comes with 10 cores. It does sound like a lot more when you compare it with A18 Pro. So, at first, I thought that the Galaxy might be faster because it has more cores.
I tested the performance of each chipset by doing just one thing at a time. It tried opening Instagram. I also tried loading the WWE website. I realised that the A18 Pro is much faster and quicker. I then tested the A18 Pro Vs Exynos 2400 by doing multiple things simultaneously.
| Category | Apple A18 Pro | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| CPU Cores | 6 cores (2 fast + 4 power-saving) | 10 cores (1 very fast + 5 fast + 4 power-saving) |
| Top Speed (GHz) | 4.05 GHz (on the 2 fast cores) | 3.21 GHz (on the 1 fastest core) |
| Single-Core Score | ~3427 (Geekbench 6) | ~2253 (Geekbench 6) |
| Multi-Core Score | ~9278 (Geekbench 6) | ~7204 (Geekbench 6) |
I opened Instagram, Facebook, and BGMI at once. The A18 Pro still performed better and faster. Even though the Exynos 2400 has more cores, the iPhone is faster. That’s because Apple’s chip is better designed and works really well with its software.
So, in both tests, the A18 Pro was the winner.
A18 Pro Vs Exynos 2400: GPU Performance
I have told you about the CPU performance and how fast these chips are. I will tell you about the GPU performance. GPU performance is all about graphics. This includes playing games, editing videos, and even using AR. The A18 Pro has a strong graphics chip that runs at 1490MHz. That’s 48 per cent faster than Exynos 2400. Games and apps look smooth in most cases.
| Feature | Apple A18 Pro (iPhone 16 Pro) | Samsung Exynos 2400 (Galaxy S24) |
|---|---|---|
| GPU Type | Apple-designed 6-core GPU | Xclipse 940 GPU (AMD RDNA 3-based) |
| GPU Speed (Clock Rate) | 1490 MHz (faster) | 1009 MHz |
| Ray Tracing | Not supported | Supported (better lighting in games) |
| 3DMark Solar Bay Score | ~6691 | ~8743 (2400), ~8242 (2400e) |
But that doesn’t mean that the Exynos 2400 is bad. Exynos 2400 has the AMD GPU. AMD is the same company that makes PC graphics cards. It supports ray tracing so the lighting and shadows are more real. I tested both with 3DMark Solar Bay, and the Galaxy beat the iPhone. It scored higher because of advanced features.
So, in the end, I can say that the A18 Pro is better for regular gaming and smooth everyday use. The Exynos 2400 is better if you want the newest, most realistic graphics.
Also Read: Snapdragon For India: Snapdragon 4s Gen 2, X Elite, Copilot+, All Details!
A18 Pro Vs Exynos 2400: AI Performance
I also checked the AI performance of A18 Pro Vs Exynos 2400. I checked them for voice commands, photo editing, and AR. The A18 Pro has a Neural Engine. It has 16 cores and can do 35 trillion tasks every second. I felt that it was good when it comes to recognising voice, editing photos fast, and AR without Internet.
| Feature | Apple A18 Pro (iPhone 16 Pro) | Samsung Exynos 2400 (Galaxy S24) |
|---|---|---|
| AI Chip | 16-core Neural Engine, up to 35 trillion tasks per second | AI chip (speed not shared) |
| AI Tasks | Fast photo editing, voice commands, AR | Real-time translation, photo editing |
| AI Speed | Faster and better for AI tasks | Good, but not as fast as the A18 Pro |
The Exynos 2400 has an AI chip called NPU. It is good with real-time translation and photo tools. Overall, I would say that the Exynos 2400 is better as it offers more AI features as compared to iPhone. These features are actually useful. With the latest updates, Samsung is sincerly working towards more improvements.
A18 Pro Vs Exynos 2400: Benchmarks
I ran some benchmark tests to compare the speed of A18 Pro vs Exynos 2400. These tests give numbers to help see which one is better.
First, I used AnTuTu 9. The A18 Pro scored about 1,840,000, which is about 9.5 per cent faster than the Exynos 2400’s score of 1,680,000.
| Test | Apple A18 Pro (iPhone 16 Pro) | Samsung Exynos 2400 (Galaxy S24) |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 9 Score | ~1,840,000 | ~1,680,000 |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 3427 | ~2253 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 9278 | ~7204 |
| 3DMark Solar Bay (Ray Tracing) | 6691 | 8743 |
Next, I tested Geekbench 6. The A18 Pro scored 3427 for single-core tasks, while the Exynos 2400 scored 2253. For multi-core tasks, the A18 Pro also won with 9278, compared to the Exynos 2400’s 7204.
However, for 3DMark Solar Bay the Exynos 2400 did better. It scored 8743, while the A18 Pro scored 6691. This shows the Exynos 2400 is better for ray tracing (fancy graphics in games).
So, the A18 Pro wins overall, but the Exynos 2400 is better for ray tracing.
Also Read: Snapdragon Processors List: Specs, Benchmarks, Best Picks!
Apple A18 Pro Vs Exynos 2400 – Real World Performance
A18 Pro chip is great when it comes to opening multiple apps at once. In the real world, it is useful and smooth. It is simple to edit videos, play games, and multitask. The Neural Engine helped with things like Live Text and Cinematic Mode. It’s also great for saving battery life, so it lasts longer even with heavy use.
| What It Does | iPhone (A18 Pro) | Galaxy (Exynos 2400) |
|---|---|---|
| Speed | Very fast and smooth | Fast, but a little slower than iPhone |
| Opening Apps | Apps open very quickly | Apps open quickly, but not as fast |
| Gaming | Great for most games | Great for games, better for fancy graphics |
| Smart Features (AI) | Good at things like Live Text and Siri | Good at live translation and better photos |
| Battery Life | Battery lasts a long time | Battery is good, but not as long |
| Best For | People who want top speed and long battery | People who like gaming and Android features |
| Overall Feeling | Super smooth and powerful | Powerful and fun, especially for gamers |
Exynos 2400 is also good. It can handle gaming and give you cool AI features like real-time translations and photography. It has ray tracing to make games look real. It is not as powerful as the A18 Pro, but it is still a strong competitor. You can customise the phone the way you want, which is something that the A18 Pro lacks.
Also Read: 5 Phones You Can Buy Instead Of iPhone 16 Pro!
You might like these too:
In A Nutshell
The Apple A18 Pro vs Exynos 2400 are both pretty powerful chips in 2025. The A18 Pro is fast and efficient. It’s great for people who love iPhones and want the best. Exynos 2400 is strong, especially for gaming. It’s a chip that offers good value for money.
If you’ve just bought a new phone and don’t know what to do with your old phone, then here’s your answer. Sell old mobile to Cashify and get the best price for it. If you are planning to buy a new phone, check out Cashify’s refurbished mobile phones. You can get your favourite phone at almost half price with six-month warranty, 15 days refund and free delivery.
